Past Hosts & Bookings: Does HO Look at Names or # of Bookings?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread explores whether the Home Office (HO) considers the names of past hosts or just the number of bookings when evaluating past host eligibility for benefits. Participants share their experiences and thoughts on the implications of this process for consultants and hosts.

Discussion Character

  • Opinion-based
  • Anecdotal
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, identifying as a consultant, expresses uncertainty about whether HO looks at names or just the number of bookings, sharing a specific situation involving a past host.
  • Another participant mentions that the actual host must be the one who booked to receive credit, suggesting that co-hosting could be a solution.
  • Several users mention that the number of bookings is what matters, with one participant relaying their director's explanation that names are not tracked.
  • One participant shares their approach of informing hosts about benefits and encouraging them to secure bookings to ensure they receive credit.
  • Another participant discusses the importance of fairness in the booking process, emphasizing that giving credit to the wrong host could lead to complications.
  • One participant expresses a personal stance against the term "stealing," suggesting that selectively replacing lost bookings can positively impact business without violating policy.
  • Several participants highlight the potential risks of misusing the booking system and the importance of adhering to established guidelines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Views differ among participants regarding the interpretation of HO's policies on bookings and host credits. Some participants agree that only the actual host should receive credit, while others suggest that there may be flexibility in certain situations.

Contextual Notes

Participants share personal experiences and interpretations of the booking process, reflecting a range of practices and beliefs within the consultant community.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to Pampered Chef consultants navigating the complexities of host bookings and eligibility for benefits.

mpkegley
Messages
844
I know that I have seen a thread about this before, but I cannot find it now.
Does HO look at the names of just the # of bookings when they check the past host? I have a past host that had 3 bookings from her show in Oct. One of those hosts decided not to do a show and I had a maybe that finally decided to do a show, but was not put in before we closed the show. If HO only looks at # of shows, then could I use this other host as one of her bookings?

I would love for the past host to get the host special, especially since the one host backed out, KWIM? I hope that I have not confused you.
 
Sorry, it needs to be the actual one that booked. The only way they could get credit on the new host is if you convinced the one that booked and her to co-host a show.
 
I am relatively new, but my director explained to me that the number was all that was significant. The number of bookings were like credits and so could be used anywhere if absolutely necessary. Obviously, I don't advertise this to my host but this is what was explained to me. She said that the actual host name was not tracked, only one host benefit per show though.

Maybe someone else can verify it better but I just wanted to relay what I had been told.
 
Unless HO has changed how it worked, they actually go by the number and not the name. When this happens to me, I tell the host that I will try to submit the show with her as a previous host (that way I am covered if the procedures have changed).
(My guess is this is a win-win for TPC. They haven't lost a projected booking, they have a happy host, and a happy consultant.)
leggy
 
HO does go with the number, but thins of WHY HO does this for us. The idea is that the host helps us to encourage the booking to happen. They are rewarded for that. If you give it to a host and it wasn't their booking (before their show closes), then you are devaluing the host program and you are stealing from Pampered Chef.
 
  • Thread starter
  • #6
It was a booking from her show, it was a maybe that didn't set a date until after the show. I had another lady that cancelled her show date and said that she just couldn't do a show. That is why I was wondering if I could put her in as past host since the other one did cancel. I don't want to steal from PC, I just feel that the past host should get the host special, KWIM?
 
This is why I tell all maybe guests that if we pencil a date in today, then the host will get credit. It's not fair to give her someone else's credit. What if the other host came back with in the 6 month time period and wanted to book? Then you wouldn't be able to give the past host the credit for the booking. Just remember, PC gives our hosts and past hosts such great benefits for a reason, trying to play up the rules isn't fair and if HO catches on they could change things to make it so we cannot do that any more.
 
This is just a question. If you have a maybe - why not just enter a date fot that person, any date. That way if/when they set it, the host will get the credit. And if they don't, it won't matter, will it?
 
fikibiff said:
This is just a question. If you have a maybe - why not just enter a date fot that person, any date. That way if/when they set it, the host will get the credit. And if they don't, it won't matter, will it?

You want to be careful how often you do this though. I always atleast make sure we pencil in a date before giving them the credit. They can change the date after that but if you don't have them at least set something, it's harder to track them down and actually get them to book. And never say that to a potential host. Just say something like "How about we pencil in a date tonight so Suzy can get the credit and I'll check back with you tomorrow to make sure that date works". You'll find out that way if they are really serious or not.
 
I can't agree with the term 'stealing" (but I respect the position...and the person who posted it).

If a host successfully replaces a lost booking, I have given her the credit. I have also selectively replaced lost bookings for hosts who had a friend cancel a scheduled booking (especially if it was due to an emergency). I feel very loyal to PC and don't advocate abusing the system, but I do believe that used selectively and intentionally this 'tool' can positively impact business.

We each know in our heart if we are being deceitful or self-serving. That is the gauge we each need to personally go by. (Having said all this, I have no interest in knowingly (or unknowingly) violating policy :eek: , so a phone call/inquiry to HO is on my to-do list!)
 
Last edited:
The way I approach it is this: During host coaching I regularly explain the host benefits. I use the Do You Love a Bargain flyer from TastyTidbits.net and show them that they can plan what host specials they want and ask their friends to have shows in those months so they can get the host special again. It also helps to get the booking when the upcoming host knows there is already an order! Then, at the show I explain the booking benefit and let people know that Suzy Host really wants the X for 60% off and is looking for someone who would like to host in that month. It is pretty powerful when the host chimes in, too! And, even more powerful when the past host is at the show and can be another voice of experience. Then at checkout I ask everyone about the opportunity as well as hosting. If they say no, I ask for a referral and explain my referral program. If they say yes, we set a date. If they are unsure, I ask if it might happen in the next 6 months and explain that if it does, the host gets the host special again. If not, no harm done since I am not out a night of work since I haven't gotten a date from them. I do try to get an approximate month so I can call them the month before to see if it would work for them. If the bookings try to back out, I let the host know and if s/he wants the booking benefit, s/he will try to get them to keep the booking.Now, my referral program might be able to help you in the current situation. If someone refers a host to me, they get $25 to spend AT THE SHOW. If they refer a consultant, they get $25 to spend with the new consultant WHEN S/HE QUALIFIES! This is something I personally do.
 
janetupnorth said:
Sorry, it needs to be the actual one that booked. The only way they could get credit on the new host is if you convinced the one that booked and her to co-host a show.

In reading the rest...you are correct, it goes by the number which is assigned to a name which is tied to a show. They don't put multi-layer checks in except to say that person had "X" bookings and gets "X" credits.

However, that being said, if you put it in with the "wrong" show and HO wanted to an audit of your shows. They would have every right to assign some type of penalty for misusing it other than the policies state.

Hence, why I would stand my ground on it needing to be the one that books.

Would you want to lose and incentive or something because you played around with things?

Granted, situations arise, but I'd try to get the original one to still hold the show or something else or give the past host another incentive.

The booking benefits are created to help US as consultants by having people book shows of the cooking shows and keep our businesses running. As many have said, if we "find a loophole" and work around the system, the system will change and we may not like it...
 

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Home Office consider the names of past hosts when evaluating bookings?

No, Home Office does not specifically look at the names of past hosts. Instead, they focus on the number of bookings and the overall performance of the consultant.

How does the number of bookings impact my standing with Pampered Chef?

The number of bookings is crucial as it reflects your activity level and success in generating sales. Higher bookings can lead to better recognition and potential rewards from the company.

Are there any benefits to having repeat hosts for my bookings?

Yes, having repeat hosts can be beneficial as it indicates a strong relationship and trust. However, Home Office primarily evaluates the total number of bookings rather than the frequency of specific hosts.

What should I focus on to increase my bookings?

To increase your bookings, focus on building relationships with potential hosts, offering incentives, and promoting the benefits of hosting a party. Engaging with your audience through social media and events can also help boost your bookings.

Can I see how my bookings compare to other consultants?

While you may not have direct access to compare your bookings with others, your performance metrics are often shared in team meetings or through reports from your upline, which can provide insight into how you stack up against peers.

Similar Pampered Chef Threads

  • LilChefBeth
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
8
Views
3K
MakinBacon
  • Tams
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
11
Views
2K
lesliec
  • ValM2010
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
2
Views
3K
Admin Greg
  • ChefPaulaB
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
4
Views
1K
Wildfire
  • Chef Bobby
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
2
Views
1K
NooraK
  • TJMagoo
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
6
Views
2K
gailz2
  • csulier
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
8
Views
2K
sarahsworld2000
  • ChefErin
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
4
Views
2K
ChefErin
  • Chef Bobby
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
4
Views
1K
cookin to the top
  • avelissar
  • Pampered Chef Bookings
Replies
5
Views
2K
Jules711
Back
Top