Anyone Use Openoffice Instead of Word?

[ChefBeckyD]

I have a trial version of Word Office on my new computer - but it is SOOO expensive! I have looked at the OpenOffice website, and it looks like a good alternative (and only $11.95!) and I read some reviews on there, but I would like to hear some reviews from people I actually know and trust........

 

[ChefBeckyD]

Okay - I just bought it online - I can be a bit impatient sometimes!

So - I'd still like to hear any feedback, and now I'll also post my feedback after I get it downloaded!

 

[jenniferknapp]

I have used it in the past. As long as you can get by the fact of learning the new toolbars and locations for different functions, it works pretty well. There are a few other tedious things that you have to remember, like to save a file you are working on for MS Word, instead of for Open Office's native format.Otherwise, it is a great alternative. (make sure that you stick to stable versions being that it is an open source program)And finally, the last I knew, it was free....???

 

[friday]

I got mine free. I have Word here, but its in Spanish and I get so frustrated trying to figure things out that I got Open Office just so I could function. I like it. I have used it for a year and a bit now.

 

[jenniferp417]

Where'd you pay $11.95? OO is always free. Did you go to a different web site than openoffice.org?

 

[jenniferp417]

I love Open Office. I have an old copy of Microsoft Office that I use sometimes because I need to be able to provide tech support for family members. I can't imagine paying for a copy of Microsoft Office again though... not when OO is wonderful and free.

 

[jenniferknapp]

Where'd you pay $11.95? OO is always free. Did you go to a different web site than openoffice.org?

I am assuming she must have gone to a site like http://www.openoffice2007.com/1495buynow.html and paid for it! I'd be worried with who has my credit card #....

 

[ChefBeckyD]

I went here Microsoft Office® Compatible Clone

I googled OpenOffice, and this is what came up.

 

[jenniferknapp]

...They do a good job at selling a free product. I would call them to see if you can cancel your order! You can download it for free at the official open office website.... OpenOffice.org: Home

 

[Admin Greg]

Yes it's become unfortunately very popular to repackage "open source" software and put it on sale. Very important to make sure you're at the orginal author's website where it is free.

 

[The_Kitchen_Guy]

I'm still using Adobe FrameMaker. I know, you've never heard of it, but that's okay. Even without being updated, it's still more robust that Microfots Wrod.

 

[cathyskitchen]

I've been using OpenOffice.org for 2 years now (for free) and it's great - works perfect!

 

[ChefBeckyD]

Well, I've been using it all day long - and although I had no idea I could get it for free:grumpy: ........it was still about 95% cheaper than purchasing Microsoft Word!
It is very similar to use though - I'm not really finding it to be difficult to navigate or figure out.

 

[Admin Greg]

I'm still using Adobe FrameMaker. I know, you've never heard of it, but that's okay. Even without being updated, it's still more robust that Microfots Wrod.

I used to make layouts using FM in high school 8 years ago for yearbook class

 

[The_Kitchen_Guy]

Greg, I'd probably use InDesign for that (I've got about 8 licenses of that, too) but Frame works for me, too.

 

[jenniferknapp]

I use InDesign all of the time... speaking of Adobe, you think Microsoft Office is expensive, take a look at any of the Adobe Suites ....I paid over $1000 for the creative suite a couple of years ago, so now it only costs about $500 to upgrade when they come out with new versions!

 

[The_Kitchen_Guy]

Good point, but if you've ever tried to build a book by fighting with MS Wrod to do it, you begin to really appreciate the power built into the Adobe suites.

 

[jenniferknapp]

Ohhhhh yes! Or people that try to edit photos in Word... I get so frustrated that I can't say "Just edit it in Photoshop!" (I work on a campus, and we have some copies available for people to use, but the majority of the people don't care...)

 

[chefann]

I hate when people try to use Excel to do page layout. There are a lot of people in IT who use Excel any time they need a table, whether there are calculations or not, and they get into the habit of reaching for that software first. Ugh!

 

[BethCooks4U]

I've used open office in the past at work and it was very user friendly once you figured out the differences. One nice thing is that with it you can open versions of microsoft word that you can't open if you happen to have to wrong version of word on your computer - go figure!

 

[ChefBeckyD]

I've used open office in the past at work and it was very user friendly once you figured out the differences. One nice thing is that with it you can open versions of microsoft word that you can't open if you happen to have to wrong version of word on your computer - go figure!

I've noticed that already! Plus I can open Excel Spreadsheets - which I never could before.

 

[The_Kitchen_Guy]

Not to mention file transport - Microfots doesn't talk to Microfots very well.

I've seen people do some amazing things with Excel, but then, I've also seen artists make amazing carvings with a chainsaw.

 

[tlennhoff]

I'm still using Adobe FrameMaker. I know, you've never heard of it, but that's okay. Even without being updated, it's still more robust that Microfots Wrod.

I have not used that in years. I think I have 5.5 somewhere around here.

 

[tlennhoff]

Good point, but if you've ever tried to build a book by fighting with MS Wrod to do it, you begin to really appreciate the power built into the Adobe suites.

Actually, I find word easier for creating a book but assume that is because it is what I learned on - I was writing books in word while writing advanced training manuals for word. I used to MS support and say "i'm using your software to do x and having this problem" and their response was "our software does x? wow, can you send us information on how you make it do that" LOL. I used to write 300-500 page training manuals using table of contents and indexing in a way that most people claim (including MS support) claimed could not be done.

 

[tlennhoff]

The only problems I've had has been somone modifying my word files in open office and loosing some of my formating but I suspect that had more to do with their lack of computer skills then open office's functionality.

 

[ChefBeckyD]

The only problems I've had has been somone modifying my word files in open office and loosing some of my formating but I suspect that had more to do with their lack of computer skills then open office's functionality.

I think that may be because (and this is an "I think") you have to save it AS a Microsoft Word file, not an OpenOffice file. In OO, you can do that!

 

[tlennhoff]

I think that may be because (and this is an "I think") you have to save it AS a Microsoft Word file, not an OpenOffice file. In OO, you can do that!

I'll bet your right. I was using reveiewer comments/editing and I'm not sure how compatible my version (2000) was iwth her version of OO.

 

[The_Kitchen_Guy]

Actually, I find word easier for creating a book but assume that is because it is what I learned on - I was writing books in word while writing advanced training manuals for word. I used to MS support and say "i'm using your software to do x and having this problem" and their response was "our software does x? wow, can you send us information on how you make it do that" LOL. I used to write 300-500 page training manuals using table of contents and indexing in a way that most people claim (including MS support) claimed could not be done.

Maybe you found the magic workarounds, but Wrod was never able to duplicate FM for pagination, indexes and TOCs. With Frame, in conversion to PDF, all of the indexes and TOCs had automagically hotlinked entries. The other thing no one was ever able to successfully control with Wrod was widows and orphans - these things were all just a piece of cake for Frame - hit the button, let 'er rip and know that everything was going to be correct.

 

[chefann]

A big part of that is because Wrod is a word-processor, not a page-layout program. Huge difference. I'm the Wrod expert on the resume team at work, because I've done funky stuff with it.

 

[tlennhoff]

Maybe you found the magic workarounds, but Wrod was never able to duplicate FM for pagination, indexes and TOCs. With Frame, in conversion to PDF, all of the indexes and TOCs had automagically hotlinked entries. The other thing no one was ever able to successfully control with Wrod was widows and orphans - these things were all just a piece of cake for Frame - hit the button, let 'er rip and know that everything was going to be correct.

Yeah we had pretty intesive directions for how to do stuff. Since we were doing things for print only at that time (some 10 years ago) we were not overly concerned with hyperlinking although on future jobs I did teach people how to make the hyperlinking work. Not simple but once you set up how to do it and followed the instructions it was not too bad. Not as easy with FM but then it takes a lot of mind change to switch from word processing to page layout (and vice versa) and my employers refused initially to send me to any training.