ChefBeckyD
Gold Member
- 20,320
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread revolves around a participant's experience with tech support issues related to the Pampered Partner software, particularly during a critical time for submitting orders. Participants share their personal experiences, offer suggestions, and express empathy regarding the stressful situation.
Views differ on whether the original poster will receive an extension from the company, with some expressing optimism and others cautioning against expecting leniency.
The discussion reflects the pressures faced by consultants during critical sales periods and the reliance on technology for order submission. Participants share their personal experiences and emotional responses to similar challenges.
Consultants experiencing technical difficulties with Pampered Partner software or those navigating stressful order submission deadlines may find the shared experiences and suggestions relevant.
tabnat80 said:For your info snooty britches, I didn't submit yesterday because my fricken pampered partner crashed at 9 pm last night. I had it all ready to go. I had been at my mom's all day and had it ready to submit. I went home, and it wouldn't pull up.Keep getting error message. You don't have to be such a b*t*H!
tabnat80 said:For your info snooty britches, I didn't submit yesterday because my fricken pampered partner crashed at 9 pm last night. I had it all ready to go. I had been at my mom's all day and had it ready to submit. I went home, and it wouldn't pull up.Keep getting error message. You don't have to be such a b*t*H!
KellyTheChef said:Whooooaaa everyone!
No, Beth does not deserve to be called names...but I am SURE it was out of anger and frustration with the situation. We have all been in that spot where we take out our anger on the wrong person. Let's not all tell her 100 different ways that she needs to back off.
Honestly, when I read Beth's post, I felt like it may be taken the wrong way. Posting online does not give us the benefit of hearing tone of voice, or of seeing body language. While I know Beth was being helpful (and came back to SAY she may have misunderstood the original question) I figured the post may have been taken the wrong way.
PLEASE let's not let this thread get out of control and turn into a bashing session. I am not saying that the post #29 was OK...I am saying let's not add fuel to the fire of an already tense situation, KWIM?
MissChef said:You know, Kelly, I have to get on here and tell you that I'm behind your post 100%. I am in no way saying it's okay to call Beth names, but I think it's because of frustration! I'm not saying that that makes it okay... I just have never seen her act that way before... and before we start saying that's not Christian like, I too am a Christian and many times need to ask for forgiveness because my tongue reacts before my common sense! Thats why it's good we are Christians because then we can go get our "checkup from the neck up" as my pastor would say. I also try to live my life by "He who is free from sin, let him cast the first stone." Well, that He would be Jesus, and I can guarantee He's not throwing stones, He's just waiting to be talked to, so He can makes things right
!
I just don't think all the bashing is going to solve things and if anything might make it worse. AGAIN, I don't think it was appropriate how post #29 was worded and I do NOT think name calling is right! And Beth I'm soooo sorry, you got hurt!
You have had a very stressful 12 hours. I was not attacking you or saying that you were trying to beat the system. HOW I READ IT was once you put the show all together you had possibly misfigured and the host hadn't reached the level you had thought. I knew that you were frustrated and everyone was encouraging you that HO would allow the show and I just wanted to point out that they may not, depending on how they looked at the situation.tabnat80 said:Beth, I'm sorry for calling you a bad name, however, I do feel that you were acting (in post 23) ugly towards me. I felt as if you thought I was just holding out the show to reach another level. Whereas I have worked very very hard to get this show done on time. I usually give my host a week to close their show, this lady only had a couple of days to do this. Her show won't even be at a week until this Thursday. And when you said "I hate to rain on your parade but it sounds like you didn't submit yesterday because you wanted the host to be able to hit the next level" that sounded like a kick in My teeth. I am not a vicious person, but when I feel that someone is taking shots at me, I shoot back. Once again, I am sorry if i misunderstood you and got ugly with you.
And just to let you know, HO has not been cooperative and I am considering resigning from the Pampered Chef. I do not want to be associated with a company that does not value their employees. I have been at this comptuer almost 12 hours trying to get this thing straightened out. The show is finally submitted. I am exausted and am going to bed.
wadesgirl said:I know sometimes there are certain situations that things happen but for all of those who have read The Pampered Chef book, Doris explains why they had to make the "no exception" rule. Technically you had all month to make the deadline. This is why I always tell people a day or two before the actual deadline. Closing a show within 2-3 days is not unreasonable as alot of us do this all the time. Sorry that this happened to you and I hope you come to a reasonable solution.
Nanisu said:Wow, are you sure you are willing to walk away from a business (obviously you are doing something right to have a $900+ show) just because of a technical glitch?What happened to you is just part of being in business for yourself. Learn to roll with the punches if you can. PC is a wonderful company and with 60,000+ consultants you have to believe that you are not the first person this has happened to. If they bend the rules for one, they have to bend it for all 60,000+....what a nightmare to keep track of.
Try to get some rest and maybe your perspective will be a little different in a couple of days. It's not like you're not going to get paid for it or something, it's just a technical glitch, not a nuclear explosion.
As for your comments to Beth, no one here is condemning you--we are not about that not even a little bit. We've all had frustrating things happen to us in this business. Been there, done that. Once again, that's part of being in business--ANY business. Hang in there, hope you stay.
BethCooks4U said:I hate to rain on your parade but it sounds like you didn't submit yesterday because you wanted the host to be able to hit the next level. That is not a reason they will accept.
DebbieJ said:Can we just let this post fade into oblivion please?
janetupnorth said:Guys - as you re-read threads and comment, you HAVE to take it in context of what was there at the time the person read and that text doesn't convey meaning.
I re-read this over and over and can totally see where Beth was coming from. She responded right after Tabitha's post about the host earning the $900 level and she was only at $845 and needed more. It was a confusing post and hard to tell what Tabitha meant. It could easily appear that she was trying to wait to get the host to the next level to which Beth replied from past experience of many that HO will not make an exception for that. She was JUST STATING FACT. Because she didn't appeal to the emotion of the situation, it appeared as cold. That is not Beth at all. She is very kind and sympathetic. But like others (myself included) we are not mushy, overly emotional reactionary people. We laugh, we cry, our hearts break with you, but we look at situations logically - cause and effect. She was stating Tabitha what effects to expect (no leniency) for the cause (show not submitted on time).
She (Beth) immediately posted that she hoped she took the post wrong and that wasn't the case but then was called some very rude names.
That was uncalled for and I'm sure hurt her very much.
I'm sure Tabitha is reacting emotionally to a very rough situation for herself and hope she doesn't make a harsh decision and quit PC, but her reaction to Beth was uncalled for.
She did apologize and hopefully those two can square that away between them.
We should not be adding further fuel and hurt to the fire by taking sides here and making it a Beth vs. Tabitha thing.
It is a Tabitha vs. her software thing!
I'm sorry she had a crash and missed incentives, but like anything else in life, put on the big girl panties and get over it. If you react emotionally and give up something potentially good (PC) over something minor you've just given up many potential blessings.
When life hands you a tough time, you don't throw up your hands and blame someone or something else...you dig in work a little harder and remember life isn't fair, but this too shall pass.
I truly believe that we are learning to teach our kids unfairly. We teach them the mushy emotional side of "Oh I'm so sorry, you shouldn't have to deal with that." Our kids learn to be all about me rather than about service to others.
I want my kids to learn that even if you do everything right, life hands you unfair situations. You may truly deserve better, but it may not come. So, don't blame others, but move on and MAKE something better.
Ok, getting off soapbox now.
Beth - thank you for your honesty and logical advice, sorry you were make to feel like crap for pointing out possible effects to think about.
Tabitha - sorry you didn't get the products, but keep take the lesson, keep chugging and your hard work will earn you more than this measly round of products.
janetupnorth said:Guys - as you re-read threads and comment, you HAVE to take it in context of what was there at the time the person read and that text doesn't convey meaning.
I re-read this over and over and can totally see where Beth was coming from. She responded right after Tabitha's post about the host earning the $900 level and she was only at $845 and needed more. It was a confusing post and hard to tell what Tabitha meant. It could easily appear that she was trying to wait to get the host to the next level to which Beth replied from past experience of many that HO will not make an exception for that. She was JUST STATING FACT. Because she didn't appeal to the emotion of the situation, it appeared as cold. That is not Beth at all. She is very kind and sympathetic. But like others (myself included) we are not mushy, overly emotional reactionary people. We laugh, we cry, our hearts break with you, but we look at situations logically - cause and effect. She was stating Tabitha what effects to expect (no leniency) for the cause (show not submitted on time).
She (Beth) immediately posted that she hoped she took the post wrong and that wasn't the case but then was called some very rude names.
That was uncalled for and I'm sure hurt her very much.
I'm sure Tabitha is reacting emotionally to a very rough situation for herself and hope she doesn't make a harsh decision and quit PC, but her reaction to Beth was uncalled for.
She did apologize and hopefully those two can square that away between them.
We should not be adding further fuel and hurt to the fire by taking sides here and making it a Beth vs. Tabitha thing.
It is a Tabitha vs. her software thing!
I'm sorry she had a crash and missed incentives, but like anything else in life, put on the big girl panties and get over it. If you react emotionally and give up something potentially good (PC) over something minor you've just given up many potential blessings.
When life hands you a tough time, you don't throw up your hands and blame someone or something else...you dig in work a little harder and remember life isn't fair, but this too shall pass.
I truly believe that we are learning to teach our kids unfairly. We teach them the mushy emotional side of "Oh I'm so sorry, you shouldn't have to deal with that." Our kids learn to be all about me rather than about service to others.
I want my kids to learn that even if you do everything right, life hands you unfair situations. You may truly deserve better, but it may not come. So, don't blame others, but move on and MAKE something better.
Ok, getting off soapbox now.
Beth - thank you for your honesty and logical advice, sorry you were make to feel like crap for pointing out possible effects to think about.
Tabitha - sorry you didn't get the products, but take the lesson, keep chugging and your hard work will earn you more than this measly round of products.
Tech support response times can vary based on several factors, including the volume of requests they are handling at any given time. During peak periods, such as product launches or major updates, the demand for assistance can significantly increase, leading to longer wait times.
To help expedite your request, ensure that you provide all necessary information upfront, including your account details, a clear description of the issue, and any troubleshooting steps you've already taken. This can help the support team address your issue more efficiently.
Typically, tech support may experience lower call volumes during off-peak hours, such as early mornings or late evenings. If possible, try reaching out during these times to potentially receive quicker assistance.
While urgent issues are prioritized, tech support teams must balance multiple requests simultaneously. Some problems may require more in-depth investigation, which can take time. It's essential to remain patient as they work to resolve your issue as quickly as possible.
While waiting for tech support, you can utilize online resources such as FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and community forums. These resources may provide immediate solutions or workarounds for your issue, helping you to continue your work without significant delays.