I Was Trying to Google Some Backgrounds and Came Across This

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread revolves around a website featuring business card designs that some participants question regarding their legality and adherence to company policies. Participants share their thoughts on the use of the Pampered Chef logo and the implications of using such designs in their business practices.

Discussion Character

  • Opinion-based
  • Anecdotal
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses curiosity about the legality of the business cards found on a website.
  • Another participant questions whether the use of the business card as an example is permissible.
  • Several users mention that the absence of the PC logo might indicate legality, but express concerns about potential violations.
  • One participant notes that having a consultant's web address on the card could be against company policy.
  • Another participant suggests that the responsibility may lie with the vendor rather than the consultant.
  • Some participants share their admiration for the business card designs while also acknowledging potential legal issues.
  • One participant reflects on the challenges of navigating company rules and the implications for consultants.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of following company guidelines and expresses frustration over rule-breaking.
  • Several users discuss the need for consultants to be aware of how their information is used by third-party vendors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Views differ on the legality and appropriateness of the business cards, with some participants expressing admiration for the designs while others raise concerns about compliance with company policies. No clear consensus emerges regarding the legality of the cards or the responsibility of the consultant versus the vendor.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a mix of personal experiences and opinions regarding the use of branding and promotional materials within the Pampered Chef consultant community.

hoosierchef
Messages
926
I was trying to google some backgrounds and came across this site!

http://www.bizprintsolutions.com/m5_view_item.html?m5:item=152

Have any of you seen this and is it "legal"? LOL (for lack of better words at this moment.).

It's really a neat idea if you ask me!!
 
I know her. What do you mean by legal? The business card itself or that they are using it as an example?
 
Last edited:
Wow - I don't know if it's legal - the PC logo isn't on it, but I would think there would be some kind of violation happening. The consultant's website is real! Very interesting!
 
Yes and no...Those business cards are awesome! But having her web address on the card as an example on the website is against our company policy, I think...
 
Well, I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on tv, but it doesn't use the logo, so at first glance, it looks like it's not illegal.
 
Sorry Erin - just saw your post, too. Is this maybe her friend or family's business?
 
I can't imagine how that would be allowed. They're using the actual PC logo on there, but they aren't a licensed vendor. Oh well, I guess with the number of people breaking the rules, they can't police everything.
 
Brandie said:
Those business cards are awesome! But having her web address on the card as an example on the website is against our company policy, I think...

I'm not sure about that - I THINK we just can't have an actual link to our sites.:confused:
 
  • Thread starter
  • #9
chefpayne said:
I know her.

Tell her that her cards are pretty cool!
 
I would say it is illegal- all the rules are created so that we are all on an even playing field, and I don't think that is even...

sent it to HO and I am sure they will set her straight...
 
Sorry, you all posted while I was typing. If you go to their templates, then direct sales and PC, you find they're PC home page, where they are using the actual logo. So it would definitely be against policy. The business cards themselves I'm not sure about though...
 
  • Thread starter
  • #12
Just for the record, I meant that I thought the Cards were really a neat idea. It didn't even hit me that her website was on there. When I saw her standing there with her apron on, which has the PC logo, that's when I began to question it's legality.
 
Gosh, I type so slow that four or five more people post before I'm able to hit submit. I feel like by the time I post what I'm saying is irrelevant...
 
chefbritt said:
Gosh, I type so slow that four or five more people post before I'm able to hit submit. I feel like by the time I post what I'm saying is irrelevant...

Don't worry about it! I do that all the time!
 
hoosierchef said:
Just for the record, I meant that I thought the Cards were really a neat idea. It didn't even hit me that her website was on there. When I saw her standing there with her apron on, which has the PC logo, that's when I began to question it's legality.

You're right - they are awesome looking!
 
They are cool- but still illegal...
 
  • Thread starter
  • #17
Yep. But if they aren't an authorized vendor.....this page really has me wondering now. They could get in some deep doo doo.....check it out. It has the PC logo on there!

http://www.bizprintsolutions.com/70.html
 
Maybe they are our new vendor! <wink wink> Just kidding. ;)
 
Now that I'm looking at it they have two other templates where they use the logo and product pictures that look like they're from HO.
 
Ooooh yeah, it sure does. I'm thinkin' big no-no! I only saw the card with Dannelle on it at first, not the other ones.
 
  • Thread starter
  • #21
Here ya go Gillian....Here's another one for ya.

http://www.ouhsc.edu/campusnotices/cbb_item.cfm?RecordID=2424
 
  • Thread starter
  • #23
I really think that some people just don't think about it when they put it up there. As a newbie, who didn't have access to this site, I probably would have made some pretty big bonehead mistakes too.
 
If she just used them to do biz cards and they use her as an example or sample template, I would think its on the vendor, not the consultant.
 
  • Thread starter
  • #25
AJPratt said:
If she just used them to do biz cards and they use her as an example or sample template, I would think its on the vendor, not the consultant.

Yeah....I would have to agree with you Ann. Although, she most likely had to give them permission to use her card.
 
I had a site use my info without my permission... I wouldn't go after the consultant. I'd go after the website. As consultants we have permission to use the logo (within guidelines, of course).

BTW, Tammi, I love your quote... its a good reminder for everyone.
 
I agree with Anne. Besides we all can find yourselves in a bit of a jam at times. Maybe extending a little grace would be good.
 
  • Thread starter
  • #28
AJPratt said:
BTW, Tammi, I love your quote... its a good reminder for everyone.

Thanks Anne! I actually "stole" that from my Best Friend. She used to be in HR and used that in her sig line. I loved it and have been using it ever since! Kind of a reminder that you never know what someone else is going through....... Judge not.......
 
Sending it to HO isn't a death sentence- they will sort out who is at fault, if anyone. I really doubt that she has no idea that her card is on their site though...
 
I think it would be on the business, too, not the consultant. She may just be the "model".
 

Similar Pampered Chef Threads

  • pamperedbecky
  • Business, Marketing and Customer Service
Replies
15
Views
3K
janetupnorth
Replies
11
Views
3K
ooshmeister
  • Bluiydangl
  • Business, Marketing and Customer Service
Replies
7
Views
2K
Nanisu
Replies
2
Views
2K
Admin Greg
  • cincychef
  • Recruiting and Team Leaders
Replies
4
Views
2K
pckelly
  • NooraK
  • Pampered Chef Shows
Replies
10
Views
3K
pampered1224
  • Intrepid_Chef
  • Pampered Chef Booths
Replies
2
Views
1K
Admin Greg
  • chefjeanine
  • Pampered Chef Sales
Replies
2
Views
2K
hollye44
Replies
5
Views
2K
katie0128
  • AshleyAllison
  • Pampered Chef Sales
Replies
4
Views
3K
AshleyAllison
Back
Top