New Executive Flash: Restrictions on Recipes for Personal Websites

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses recent changes regarding the types of recipes Pampered Chef consultants can post on their personal websites. Participants express their feelings about these restrictions and share their experiences with using recipes in their business practices.

Discussion Character

  • Opinion-based
  • Anecdotal
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, identifying as a consultant, expresses frustration over the new policy that restricts posting non-Pampered Chef recipes on personal websites, feeling it limits their ability to share beloved recipes with customers.
  • Another participant shares an email from a director explaining that the policy is not new, but emphasizes that consultants can no longer type up Pampered Chef recipes themselves for their websites.
  • Several users mention that they are only allowed to post recipes that can be copied and pasted from the Pampered Chef website, which some find limiting.
  • One participant notes that they feel confused about the rules, especially after just starting to use their website.
  • Another participant shares their experience of using non-Pampered Chef recipes at shows, suggesting that it may be problematic under the new guidelines.
  • Some participants express a desire to incorporate their own cooking styles and recipes into their presentations, indicating a preference for flexibility in recipe usage.
  • One participant highlights the challenges of selling Pampered Chef products in a rural area where customers often prefer cheaper alternatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Views differ among participants regarding the impact of the new recipe restrictions. While some express strong dissatisfaction, others seem to understand the reasoning behind the policy. No clear consensus emerges on how to navigate these changes.

Contextual Notes

Participants share personal experiences and feelings about the implications of the new policy on their business practices and customer interactions. The discussion reflects a mix of emotions, including frustration, confusion, and a desire for more flexibility.

Who May Find This Useful

Consultants navigating the new recipe posting guidelines on their personal websites may find the shared experiences and viewpoints relevant to their own situations.

A couple of things for you to keep in mind.

One) Relatively speaking, your Pampered Chef website is very economical. In fact, it's downright cheap. Check with your local ISP and find out what they would charge you per month to host a site. Suddenly, 7 bucks a month will look really attractive.

Two) 7 bucks a month starts to look even better when you find out what a good web designer would charge you for a web site - not just for setup but for maintenance, too. Pampered Chef makes setup and maintenance essentially idiot-proof.

Sidebar - owning a copy of GoLive or Front Page does not make someone a web designer any more than owning a stethoscope makes one a doctor.

Three) Giving up your Pampered Chef website over this issue would be a grave tactical error and a worse strategic decision.

As irritating as the recipe faux pas is, it is merely a speed bump in the highway of your Pampered Chef life.
 
Here, here Kitchen Guy!
 
i understand what you are saying, but to your comment about not being a web designer, i may not be, but my husband is :D but anyways. i know what you mean. its just irritating to be told what to do over every little thing. i just dont get what the big problem is over a simple recipe!!! the way i see it i already paid for 6 months im going to keep it for 6 months!! to cheap not to! i didnt want the thing to begin with. my husband is the one who wanted me to have it!! but i will be good and stop griping about it!! lol :cool:
 
fruit76loop said:
Oh...Kitchen Guy...what would we do with out you? :rolleyes: You keep us light hearted, thank you!! And I want this recipe! :D
Alright, alright, alright...Thank You All! Instead of answering all the messages I'm getting, here's the open reply to everyone who wrote to me!

It's an old joke - I'm showing my age, I guess. "Kickapoo Joy Juice" was a concoction brewed up in the fertile mind of Al Capp when he drew his comic strip, Li'l Abner. The most potent moonshine was brewed in Dogpatch, U.S.A. at the Skonk Werks*, by characters named Lonesome Polecat and Hairless Joe.

Follow this link to read about Li'l Abner, Dogpatch and http://www.lil-abner.com/kickapoo.html.

There is a rumor that someone is marketing a product (licensed) under this name, but I haven't been able to find it.

Li'l Abner, by the way, was an extremely popular comic strip in its day with biting social commentary. It spawned two movies and vast merchandising. A Broadway musical of the strip debuted in 1956 and ran for several years. (It was made into a movie in 1959.) The play is still performed by high schools and theatre groups.

I would imagine, that in today's world of politcal correctness gone mad, the strip would have far more detractors than fans. The strip was full of stereotypical characters that burst with naive goodness and purity, like Abner Yokum, Mammy and Pappy Yokum and the long-suffering Daisy Mae Scraggs. Lots of colorful characters with names like Senator Jack S. Phogbound, Earthquake McGoon, Fearless Fosdick, General Bullmoose and everyone's favorite jinx, Joe Btfsplk, peppered the strip along with words that have found their way into the American lexicon like skunk works* and the lovable schmoo. Every high school in America had a Sadie Hawkins Day race, also a Capp invention, the day when Dogpatch women were allowed to chase bachelors and marry the one they caught. (Joe Btfsplk walked around with his own little black cloud that was always raining on him.)

The bottom line is, I'm sorry, you can't make Kickpoo Joy Juice in a Quick-Stir® pitcher. (It would probably melt, anyway.)

------------------

* - The term "Skonk Works" was later adopted by Lockheed Aircraft and chaged to "Skunk Works" when Al Capp objected to the use of his copyrighted term. To this day, "skunk works" is a generic term that refers to a secret group within a company that develops products quickly, often on the edge of illigitimacy, unhampered by corporate hierarchy and protocals. At Lockheed, where they consider the term a trademark, the Skunk Works developed many secret military aircraft, including the U2 and the SR-71 Blackbird spy planes.
 
omg. That was awesome. Cheers to KitchenGuy! LOL!!! :D :D :D
 
Did you get the message today?An e-mail from TPC today says they are revisiting this issue. No changes are required in our websites at this time.

I think that answers the question of whether or not HO monitors this site. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • #37
Victory for now...Wow, I am so excited to know that the Home Office has realized the pain this was causing! Maybe they will add more recipes that we can cut and paste! If we had all of the recipes from the cookbooks, I certainly would not have complained! But of course all we had were the 2 Season's Best Fall and Spring and the 2 Una Muestra's Fall and Spring!

Keeping my fingers crossed! :D
 
I don't think I would start planning on cookbook recipes being added to the website for C&P. If all the cookbook recipes were on the website, what reason would we have to sell cookbooks, let alone, what reason would a customer have for buying them?

Perhaps some old standbyes from out-of-print cookbooks?
 
  • Thread starter
  • #39
I was thinking....of on Consultant's Corner!! :p They could have all of the recipes available to us, not our customers! This way we would have access to them and still sale our cookbooks. I personally think I sale so many cookbooks because of the gorgeous pictures! These pictures always make me hungry!! :D
 
fruit76loop said:
of on Consultant's Corner!! :p They could have all of the recipes available to us, not our customers! This way we would have access to them and still sale our cookbooks. I personally think I sale so many cookbooks because of the gorgeous pictures! These pictures always make me hungry!! :D
I think you're on to something.

Over the years, there has been a feature base for recipes - braids, rings, twists - that could be filled with everything from brunch fruits to main course fillings. Personally, I was never much of a fan of the twist (too much bread for my taste) or the ring (too much effort for a show) but I still use the braid for shows and in my own home.

Maybe TPC test kitchens could come up with another base recipe like a twist, and give us various fillings to use with them. We could post the base and then rotate fillings from time to time.
 

Similar Pampered Chef Threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
pamperedlinda
  • Linda Zamora
  • Recipes and Tips
Replies
2
Views
2K
esavvymom
  • Sticky
  • lt1jane
  • Products and Tips
Replies
13
Views
20K
scottcooks
  • ajnewchef
  • Business, Marketing and Customer Service
Replies
20
Views
4K
tys1031
  • jrb0328
  • General Pampered Chef Chat
Replies
5
Views
1K
stefani2
  • Karen
  • General Pampered Chef Chat
Replies
10
Views
2K
lisasfuncooking
  • pc_jessica
  • General Pampered Chef Chat
Replies
8
Views
2K
jackieblue
  • BethCooks4U
  • General Pampered Chef Chat
Replies
7
Views
3K
Pampered Sofia
  • DebbieJ
  • General Pampered Chef Chat
Replies
16
Views
3K
katie0128
  • delightfulkitchen
  • General Pampered Chef Chat
Replies
2
Views
5K
Admin Greg
Back
Top