pchockeymom
- 1,515
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread explores the perspectives of male Pampered Chef consultants regarding the incentives offered by the company, particularly focusing on the perceived lack of masculine options. Participants share their experiences and opinions about the current incentives and suggest alternatives that could be more appealing to male consultants.
Views differ on the adequacy of current incentives, with some participants expressing dissatisfaction and others suggesting practical alternatives. No clear consensus emerges on the best way to address the issue.
The discussion reflects the experiences and opinions of male consultants within a predominantly female-oriented business environment, highlighting their desire for more inclusive and diverse incentive options.
Male consultants and those interested in understanding the perspectives of their peers regarding incentive offerings in the Pampered Chef community may find this discussion relevant.
pchockeymom said:The no jeans policy is one of the very first things my recruit told me cuz she knows I'm a jeans gal. She's been a consultant for 18 years. In our business guide it states we are to wear "business casual attire" which my recruit instructed me means no jeans.
pchockeymom said:The no jeans policy is one of the very first things my recruit told me cuz she knows I'm a jeans gal. She's been a consultant for 18 years. In our business guide it states we are to wear "business casual attire" which my recruit instructed me means no jeans.
Sheila said:I think if they offered an alternative of PC Dollars it would be a GREAT solution! Even for the women who don't want a certain incentive. I didn't even try for the December apron because I knew I wouldn't wear it. If they had offered an alternative option of PC Dollars, I probably would have worked to earn it.![]()
For me it takes just as long to put on a nice pair of slacks as it does a pair of jeans so why wouldn't I want to look a little more professional. I don't think I put off any of my guests of thinking about the business by the way I dress.pampered1224 said:Dressing in "casual business attire", nice slacks like Dockers and a polo shirt is considered to be a standard "comfortable" look in the business world. There is a certain air one wears when dressed comfortably but nicely. It portrays a look of money and pride without being pretentious. No lie, that was a definition I found once a while ago. We want to look like we are comfortable in our jobs, have a bit of money, and that we take pride in our selves and our jobs. Jeans have always been considered WORK clothes. Not that you can not look good and confident but there has always been that stigma that jeans represent the down trodden and taken advantage of. So no, you do not have to look that way at shows, you can go in jeans. You then have to live with the message that is received by guests. And I say it that way because we know that you are representing your business in a business like manner but, jeans can send the opposite message to guests. It is just not considered business, by any business, to wear jeans. It is considered to be too overly casual to make that earlier statement.
This discussion comes up every year as we get ready for NC. I am convinced it's a regional thing. I do secretarial temping. Many businesses in our area consider nice, dark, dressy jeans to be appropriate for business casual wear as long as they're paired with other business-like pieces. Since the HO states "no denim" for NC, I wear slacks there. As for what to wear to do shows, I think that really depends on your customers. I wear nice jeans and a PC logo-wear top to my shows. I have never felt under-dressed. If I were in an area where people were mostly more dressed up, I'd definitely dress accordingly.It is just not considered business, by any business, to wear jeans. It is considered to be too overly casual to make that earlier statement.