janetupnorth
Gold Member
- 14,814
Makes perfect sense to me!
I am in the category of "recruiting" if the situation arises, supporting as able, but not going to give up my FT job unless PC would be worth it...which is a long way off. However, I would hate to build a team so to speak, yet have to accept directorship, lose them and feel as if I'm working for someone else to benefit.
I personally like the theory of holding off on directorship, since they stay part of my director's first line until I accept and let them train and earn commission until I would be ready to take over.
I see so many pushing to achieve directorship, taking it before they are ready sometimes, whether it be too early in their learning, family or job conflicts, etc. then losing it and their consultants. I can really see where these changes help with the long-term structure.
I am in the category of "recruiting" if the situation arises, supporting as able, but not going to give up my FT job unless PC would be worth it...which is a long way off. However, I would hate to build a team so to speak, yet have to accept directorship, lose them and feel as if I'm working for someone else to benefit.
I personally like the theory of holding off on directorship, since they stay part of my director's first line until I accept and let them train and earn commission until I would be ready to take over.
I see so many pushing to achieve directorship, taking it before they are ready sometimes, whether it be too early in their learning, family or job conflicts, etc. then losing it and their consultants. I can really see where these changes help with the long-term structure.