• Join Chef Success Today! Get support for your Pampered Chef business today! Increase your sales right now! Download 1000s of files and images, view thousands of Pampered Chef support threads! Totally Free!

McCain-Palin Ticket: Playing With Fire?

In summary, McCain and Palin are playing with fire by referring to Obama with scorn and anger. They should condemn these slurs immediately.
cathyskitchen
Gold Member
2,707
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/10/AR2008101002456_pf.html

McCain and Palin Are Playing With Fire

By Khaled Hosseini
Sunday, October 12, 2008; B05

I prefer to discuss politics through my novels, but I am truly dismayed these days. Twice last week alone, speakers at McCain-Palin rallies have referred to Sen. Barack Obama, with unveiled scorn, as Barack Hussein Obama.

Never mind that this evokes -- and brazenly tries to resurrect -- the unsavory, cruel days of our past that we thought we had left behind. Never mind that such jeers are deeply offensive to millions of peaceful, law-abiding Muslim Americans who must bear the unveiled charge, made by some supporters of Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin, that Obama's middle name makes him someone to distrust -- and, judging by some of the crowd reactions at these rallies, someone to persecute or even kill. As a secular Muslim, I too was offended. Obama's middle name differs from my last name by only two vowels. Does the McCain-Palin campaign view me as a pariah too? Do McCain and Palin think there's something wrong with my name?

But never mind any of that.

The real affront is the lack of firm response from either McCain or Palin. Neither has had the moral courage, when taking the stage, to grasp the microphone, turn to the presenter and, right then and there, denounce the use of Obama's middle name as an insult. Instead, they have simply delivered their stump speeches, lacing into Obama as if nothing out-of-bounds had just happened. The McCain-Palin ticket has given toxic speeches accusing Obama of being a friend of terrorists, then released short, meek repudiations of some of the rough stuff, including McCain's call Friday to "be respectful." Back in February, the Arizona senator apologized for the "disparaging remarks" from a talk-radio host who sneered repeatedly about "Barack Hussein Obama" before a McCain rally. "We will have a respectful debate," McCain insisted afterward. But pretending to douse flames that you are busy fanning does not qualify as straight talk.

What I find most unconscionable is the refusal of the McCain-Palin tandem to publicly condemn the cries of "traitor," "liar," "terrorist" and (worst of all) "kill him!" that could be heard at recent rallies. McCain is perfectly capable of telling hecklers off. But not once did he or his running mate bother to admonish the people yelling these obscene -- and potentially dangerous -- words. They may not have been able to hear the slurs at the rallies, but surely they have had ample time since to get on camera and warn that this sort of ugliness has no place in an election season. But they have not. Simply calling Obama "a decent person" is not enough.

Is inaction tantamount to consent? The McCain campaign certainly thinks so when it comes to Obama and incendiary remarks from the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. By their own inaction, then, are McCain and Palin condoning these slurs? Or worse, are they willfully inciting the angry and venomous response that we have been witnessing at their rallies? If not, then what reaction are they hoping to evoke by their relentless public suggestions that Obama is basically an anti-American liar who won't put "country first" and has an affection for terrorists? Do they not understand the kind of fire they are playing with?

I -- and, I suspect, millions of Americans like me, Republicans and Democrats alike -- couldn't care less about Obama's middle name or the ridiculous six-degrees-of-separation game that is the William Ayers non-issue. The Taliban are clawing their way back in Afghanistan, the country that I hope many of my fellow Americans have come to understand better through my novels. People are losing their homes and their jobs and are watching the future slip away from them. But instead of addressing these problems, the McCain-Palin ticket is doing its best to distract Americans by provoking fear, anxiety and hatred. Country first? Hardly.

Khaled Hosseini is the author of "The Kite Runner" and "A Thousand Splendid Suns."
 
Cathy.. his middle name is Hussein. That is his legal middle name. If you weren't aware.
 
And yet somehow McCain was the one to "get his feelings hurt" by supposed name-calling, according to last night's debate.
 
What's the diff? It's his NAME, what's wrong w/ saying it in full? Sarah Palin referred to McCain as John S. McCain a number of times.
I think his background makes all the difference in the world as to who he is and his character. His having a Muslim background matters to me and his shady associations matter as well.
Just because someone is offended that they keep bringing up his full name? So what? If I didn't have a shady past, I certainly wouldn't care if someone used my full name over and over...Just like wiretapping, which I know is another can of worms, but if someone really wants to listen in to my convo's about sick kids, housework, PC, I could care less. Have at it! I have nothing to hide!
 
chefsteph07 said:
What's the diff? It's his NAME, what's wrong w/ saying it in full? Sarah Palin referred to McCain as John S. McCain a number of times.
I think his background makes all the difference in the world as to who he is and his character. His having a Muslim background matters to me and his shady associations matter as well.
Just because someone is offended that they keep bringing up his full name? So what? If I didn't have a shady past, I certainly wouldn't care if someone used my full name over and over...Just like wiretapping, which I know is another can of worms, but if someone really wants to listen in to my convo's about sick kids, housework, PC, I could care less. Have at it! I have nothing to hide!


There's nothing wrong with saying his full name. It's the fact that they're saying it to stir up negative emotions by saying the name that upsets people. They aren't saying his full name to be formal or anything.
 
Hathery said:
There's nothing wrong with saying his full name. It's the fact that they're saying it to stir up negative emotions by saying the name that upsets people. They aren't saying his full name to be formal or anything.

There's all kinds of things that Obama says that stirs up negative emotion...I really don't see the difference.
 
chefsteph07 said:
There's all kinds of things that Obama says that stirs up negative emotion...I really don't see the difference.

There isn't any difference.
 
Well ok then! LOL
Glad we agree on that one! So, this article then should really mean nothing because it's being done on both sides to stir up negative feelings...
Well, it didn't mean anything to me anyway, but you know what I mean...
 
  • #10
chefsteph07 said:
Well ok then! LOL
Glad we agree on that one! So, this article then should really mean nothing because it's being done on both sides to stir up negative feelings...
Well, it didn't mean anything to me anyway, but you know what I mean...

Exactly :) I think there is too much of the sneaky name-calling business going around on both sides, and that has historically been the case. The issues always get buried underneath all the character-assasination junk :(
 

1. What is the "McCain-Palin Ticket: Playing With Fire?"

"McCain-Palin Ticket: Playing With Fire" is a book written by political journalist Robert Draper that examines the 2008 presidential campaign of John McCain and Sarah Palin. It delves into the controversies and tensions within the Republican party during the election and sheds light on the strategies and decisions made by the McCain-Palin ticket.

2. Is the book biased towards one political party or candidate?

While the author has been accused of being biased towards the Democratic party in the past, "McCain-Palin Ticket: Playing With Fire" is considered to be an objective and well-researched account of the 2008 election. It presents both positive and negative aspects of the McCain-Palin campaign and offers insights from various sources, including interviews with key players.

3. What new information does the book reveal about the McCain-Palin campaign?

The book offers a behind-the-scenes look at the dynamics between John McCain and Sarah Palin, as well as the tensions and divisions within the Republican party during the 2008 election. It also delves into the controversies surrounding Palin, such as her lack of experience and her role in the campaign's messaging.

4. Is the book suitable for all audiences?

"McCain-Palin Ticket: Playing With Fire" is a political non-fiction book that may not be suitable for all audiences. It covers complex and controversial topics related to the 2008 election and may contain mature language. Readers should use their own discretion when deciding if the book is appropriate for them.

5. Can I purchase the book through Pampered Chef?

No, Pampered Chef does not sell books and does not carry "McCain-Palin Ticket: Playing With Fire" in our product line. However, the book is widely available for purchase through major book retailers and online platforms.

Similar Pampered Chef Threads

Replies
308
Views
19K
BethCooks4U
  • susanr613
  • General Chat
2 3
Replies
100
Views
6K
fikibiff
  • The_Kitchen_Guy
  • General Chat
Replies
2
Views
1K
sharalam
Replies
2
Views
1K
Admin Greg
Back
Top